MaxMike
Mar 2, 08:02 PM
From my trip to the Bahamas a few years ago.
http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z189/jerseyshoreguy/Screenshot2011-03-02at90021PM.png
http://i193.photobucket.com/albums/z189/jerseyshoreguy/Screenshot2011-03-02at90021PM.png
dmw007
Oct 14, 06:50 AM
No, they decided to release XP SP3 ...they just decided to rename it to Vista.
LOL :D I think that your summary is quite accurate zweigand. :D :)
LOL :D I think that your summary is quite accurate zweigand. :D :)
Mord
Aug 3, 03:46 AM
?
http://rohsusa.com/Quickstart/ImageLib/turkey.jpg
?
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:J7e4UWXOqxhQMM:http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e363/kevink252007/rolleyes.gif&t=1
You know what I mean :P
I've not drunk beer in around two years though so I'm probably out of touch, I just can't imagine Fosters or Carlsberg taste any less like piss than they did.
http://rohsusa.com/Quickstart/ImageLib/turkey.jpg
?
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:J7e4UWXOqxhQMM:http://i43.photobucket.com/albums/e363/kevink252007/rolleyes.gif&t=1
You know what I mean :P
I've not drunk beer in around two years though so I'm probably out of touch, I just can't imagine Fosters or Carlsberg taste any less like piss than they did.
PlipPlop
Apr 19, 06:16 AM
Ill be looking foward to playing on my beast crossfire 6970s
AidenShaw
Oct 15, 11:10 AM
While I don't doubt that in Jan it will be relatively solid and that both MS and Apple both update new OS's relatively soon afterwards, I do doubt your optimism on the the business launch. Generik's point on the timing allowing MS to say that they met their license obligations is more likely.
I'm sure MS had some contract issues, but they also probably welcome the "slow start" and the opportunity to find and fix odd configuration and other issues before the full scale launch.
However, when I look at the number of people in my development team who are already running Vista on their home and office systems, I suspect that there will be millions of Vista users before the "consumer" shipment in January. I know that we can buy "business" machines on our employee purchase programs, and our Vista volume license agreement will let us install it on any capable machine that we want....
The majority of businesses aren't going to be implementing Vista this year ... Until late our company was routinely wiping XP from newly purchased PCs and loading Windows NT.
No argument here - IT departments are notoriously conservative, and often for good reasons.
We'll see how it comes out, but Vista's improved security and manageability over XP/W2K does offer a little more incentive for an IT department to deploy Vista than the corresponding XP upgrade.
In any event, I think that the two-stage release of Vista will make the consumer release in January a less traumatic event ;) .
Whether you want to call the business release "RC3" or to call the consumer release "SP1", the January release will benefit from the additional configuration testing.
I'm sure MS had some contract issues, but they also probably welcome the "slow start" and the opportunity to find and fix odd configuration and other issues before the full scale launch.
However, when I look at the number of people in my development team who are already running Vista on their home and office systems, I suspect that there will be millions of Vista users before the "consumer" shipment in January. I know that we can buy "business" machines on our employee purchase programs, and our Vista volume license agreement will let us install it on any capable machine that we want....
The majority of businesses aren't going to be implementing Vista this year ... Until late our company was routinely wiping XP from newly purchased PCs and loading Windows NT.
No argument here - IT departments are notoriously conservative, and often for good reasons.
We'll see how it comes out, but Vista's improved security and manageability over XP/W2K does offer a little more incentive for an IT department to deploy Vista than the corresponding XP upgrade.
In any event, I think that the two-stage release of Vista will make the consumer release in January a less traumatic event ;) .
Whether you want to call the business release "RC3" or to call the consumer release "SP1", the January release will benefit from the additional configuration testing.
Hastings101
Mar 29, 08:12 AM
When I did folding@home on a computer I did it on an 1.42 ghz eMac, nothing compared to what you guys use now :p but it was the only thing I had at the time.
Right now I use my PS3 running 24/7 as my folding machine.
I've never been big on Folding@home, I'd rather donate money or my time to an organization (I'm not bashing Folding@Home though, I think it's a great thing, it just doesn't interest me personally).
Right now I use my PS3 running 24/7 as my folding machine.
I've never been big on Folding@home, I'd rather donate money or my time to an organization (I'm not bashing Folding@Home though, I think it's a great thing, it just doesn't interest me personally).
TebWeb
Apr 12, 03:40 PM
I'd be all for something like this. Normal 3D displays are useless to me, I have an eye condition that doesn't allow me to see 3D. So I should at least have SOME 3D fun.
I'll second that. I am also what they now call as having "3D Blindness" where I cannot see 3D effect with glasses. This may prove to be the better way to provide 3D effect where "everyone" can experience it. Current 3D tech using glasses leaves out a good percentage of the population. Plus, no need for glasses is an advantage in itself.
I'll second that. I am also what they now call as having "3D Blindness" where I cannot see 3D effect with glasses. This may prove to be the better way to provide 3D effect where "everyone" can experience it. Current 3D tech using glasses leaves out a good percentage of the population. Plus, no need for glasses is an advantage in itself.
amnesiak
Oct 16, 03:56 AM
where did u see it?
300D
Mar 22, 10:30 PM
@300D: your conclusion about X1900GT is based on PC world scores.
No difference. Same hardware, only the firmware is changed.
Most of barefeats benches (gaming) are pointing that 7800 is faster than X1900GT, esp. in higher resolutions. 7800GTX 512MB (flashed) has 8 pipes more and twice RAM than X1900GT (24 vs 16).
Too bad its still slower, I've tried it and the X1900 is better in every category.
and can't think of any apps I would use that would even recognize more than 2 cores.
FYI, EVERY application run in OSX natively takes advantage of multi-cpus.
Even on a G4, OSX will make every attempt to load the CPUs evenly no matter the application. There are only a few very rare instances where the work can't be split up, and most of them are limited to photoshop's outdated tools.
No difference. Same hardware, only the firmware is changed.
Most of barefeats benches (gaming) are pointing that 7800 is faster than X1900GT, esp. in higher resolutions. 7800GTX 512MB (flashed) has 8 pipes more and twice RAM than X1900GT (24 vs 16).
Too bad its still slower, I've tried it and the X1900 is better in every category.
and can't think of any apps I would use that would even recognize more than 2 cores.
FYI, EVERY application run in OSX natively takes advantage of multi-cpus.
Even on a G4, OSX will make every attempt to load the CPUs evenly no matter the application. There are only a few very rare instances where the work can't be split up, and most of them are limited to photoshop's outdated tools.
LightSpeed1
Apr 28, 08:56 PM
The larger and more popular Apple becomes as a company, the harder it will become for them to keep such a tight lid on what we're not supposed to see. From the first iPhone to the last, look at their ability to keep their unreleased projects away from the tech blogs. It will only get worst.
Evangelion
Jul 12, 02:42 PM
But the damn site is all voluntary, no real authority.
So? Fact remains, that according to independent studies, Wikipedia is very accurate. Do you think that you can only do a good job when you are paid to do so?
People could change something on less looked at articles and nobody'd no the difference!
nobody would know the difference? Hardly
My sister's professors do not allow their students to you Wikipedia!
That's their choice. It still does not change he fact that according to independent studies, Wikipedia is very accurate. At this point I gues that you will just close your eyes, cover your ears and shout "LALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!". But that does not change the FACTS.
Just because something's longer doesn't mean it's bettter!
Am I speaking latin here or something? Let me repeat what I have said: According to independent studies, Wikipedia is very accurate. Meaning: There are very few errors in the entries in Wikipedia. IN ADDITION TO THAT, Wikipedia has longer articles (on average) than Britannica (for example) does. I have NOT said "Wikipedia is better because the articles are longer". I have said that "Articles in Wikipedia are very accurate AND the are on average longer than ones in Britannica". Longer articles means that they have more information than shorter articles do.
Suppose that you were looking for information about string theory (for example). Would you prefer an article on the subject that consist of one paragraph, or one that consists of twelwe paragraphs?
If you've ever used Encyclopaedia Brittanica or the World Book, the authors are pros on the subject, not just some bum that's obcessed with Google!
What makes you think that authors in Wikipedia are "bums"? What makes you think that they are not experts in their field?
You obviously have an axe to grind when it comes to Wikipedia. I haven't seen any reason why you should call the wikipediaistas "bums". So what is your problem here?
So? Fact remains, that according to independent studies, Wikipedia is very accurate. Do you think that you can only do a good job when you are paid to do so?
People could change something on less looked at articles and nobody'd no the difference!
nobody would know the difference? Hardly
My sister's professors do not allow their students to you Wikipedia!
That's their choice. It still does not change he fact that according to independent studies, Wikipedia is very accurate. At this point I gues that you will just close your eyes, cover your ears and shout "LALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU!". But that does not change the FACTS.
Just because something's longer doesn't mean it's bettter!
Am I speaking latin here or something? Let me repeat what I have said: According to independent studies, Wikipedia is very accurate. Meaning: There are very few errors in the entries in Wikipedia. IN ADDITION TO THAT, Wikipedia has longer articles (on average) than Britannica (for example) does. I have NOT said "Wikipedia is better because the articles are longer". I have said that "Articles in Wikipedia are very accurate AND the are on average longer than ones in Britannica". Longer articles means that they have more information than shorter articles do.
Suppose that you were looking for information about string theory (for example). Would you prefer an article on the subject that consist of one paragraph, or one that consists of twelwe paragraphs?
If you've ever used Encyclopaedia Brittanica or the World Book, the authors are pros on the subject, not just some bum that's obcessed with Google!
What makes you think that authors in Wikipedia are "bums"? What makes you think that they are not experts in their field?
You obviously have an axe to grind when it comes to Wikipedia. I haven't seen any reason why you should call the wikipediaistas "bums". So what is your problem here?
Hisdem
Jan 15, 09:35 PM
Please share that NSX's picture with us. It's gorgeous. ;)
KREX725
Jul 12, 05:20 PM
Didn't they do something like this with the eMac when it first came out? It took them a while to release that eventually to the public. My guess is what happened is that they relized that there was a lot of demand for these amongst students and teachers and got worried that they wouldn't have enough to supply the schools.
That was my first thought too. Maybe they got enough response from non-schools that they are worried the supply wouldn't hold up to get the schools stocked before the new school year.
Just like the eMac originally being this way, I think once school is in full swing and Apple is caught up, we'll see these offered to teachers and higher edu students.
That was my first thought too. Maybe they got enough response from non-schools that they are worried the supply wouldn't hold up to get the schools stocked before the new school year.
Just like the eMac originally being this way, I think once school is in full swing and Apple is caught up, we'll see these offered to teachers and higher edu students.
Pachang
Apr 10, 11:55 PM
You do realize that Jobs is not an engineer. Nor has he ever programmed anything.
I have read all the patents where he's the first name listed. There's only about a half dozen, mostly ideas related to iPods and icons. And that gooseneck monitor arm. Oh, and he came up with the slide-to-power-off thingie you see if you hold down the iPhone power button.
My favorite: while the iPhone was being worked on by his employees, he applied for a patent for a telephone dial UI driven by a clickwheel. It was almost as cool as the Onion's "MacBook Wheel (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA)" parody:
that patent was a joke dude lol. http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2010/12/apple-wins-patent-for-their-great-faked-out-rotary-dial-iphone.html
I have read all the patents where he's the first name listed. There's only about a half dozen, mostly ideas related to iPods and icons. And that gooseneck monitor arm. Oh, and he came up with the slide-to-power-off thingie you see if you hold down the iPhone power button.
My favorite: while the iPhone was being worked on by his employees, he applied for a patent for a telephone dial UI driven by a clickwheel. It was almost as cool as the Onion's "MacBook Wheel (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BnLbv6QYcA)" parody:
that patent was a joke dude lol. http://www.patentlyapple.com/patently-apple/2010/12/apple-wins-patent-for-their-great-faked-out-rotary-dial-iphone.html
n-abounds
Sep 12, 12:22 PM
Oh! I should sell my Apple stock!!
It is down 6 cents!!!!!!!! Oh my!
I never said you should. It's just an indication of how the event is going. Apple stock is highly volatile and usually irrational.
It is down 6 cents!!!!!!!! Oh my!
I never said you should. It's just an indication of how the event is going. Apple stock is highly volatile and usually irrational.
TuffLuffJimmy
Mar 25, 08:15 PM
She may, or may not, have exercised poor judgement. We do not know. We don't know if jumping on the hood of a car with your pissed off husband in the driver's seat is poor judgement? Come now, skunk. Be honest. I understand that you think the wife shouldn't be given any legal charges, this much I agree with, but don't tell me we don't know if she used poor judgement.
He, definitely and 100%, was a homicidal tool. We do know that. He admitted as much. Cool. I never argued that wasn't so.
Only one person is guilty.Of what exactly? You seem to be arguing two different discussions and argue with ambiguity.
He, definitely and 100%, was a homicidal tool. We do know that. He admitted as much. Cool. I never argued that wasn't so.
Only one person is guilty.Of what exactly? You seem to be arguing two different discussions and argue with ambiguity.
Texas04
Nov 13, 10:05 PM
Problems!!!!
Aghh SO as soon as I downloaded it I got up on Bonjour (my mom just bought her MacBook) and I was going to show her the video chat through Bonjour, well after I connected to iChat it dissconnected me and her from Bonjour?? Anyone else having bonjour problems? It might be something else but seeing as it happened right after the update it makes me question...
Aghh SO as soon as I downloaded it I got up on Bonjour (my mom just bought her MacBook) and I was going to show her the video chat through Bonjour, well after I connected to iChat it dissconnected me and her from Bonjour?? Anyone else having bonjour problems? It might be something else but seeing as it happened right after the update it makes me question...
IJ Reilly
Jan 4, 12:43 AM
I'd recommend setting a time later in the afternoon, say 3:00 PM each day of the show. I know this is when my dogs are usually getting pretty tired and I'm looking for a sit-down.
There are four semi-circular seating areas on the ground level of South Hall, at the top of the escalators. I say just pick one, and a time, and see who shows up.
There are four semi-circular seating areas on the ground level of South Hall, at the top of the escalators. I say just pick one, and a time, and see who shows up.
bowens
Aug 8, 03:29 PM
I can't get the video to play at all. I have been trying all day. I have also tried downloading with the suggested programs and they don't even start. This sucks.
Corax
Apr 5, 01:47 PM
Oh my goodness...!:eek:
eternlgladiator
Apr 26, 12:21 PM
Pretty sure he's in a parking lot and parked, buddy.
I don't think so unless they're that afraid of door dings in belgium. That's traffic.
I don't think so unless they're that afraid of door dings in belgium. That's traffic.
Tommyg117
Aug 19, 10:11 PM
Steve is definitely upset, first Apple "surprise" officially foiled?
rjohnstone
May 4, 03:06 PM
Meanwhile Google is still tracking Fandroids in almost real time.
You get what you pay for. ;)
Umm.. not exactly.
Android ASKS you FIRST. And if you change your mind about using their location tracking, you can simply turn it off and it actually stays off. ;)
You get what you pay for. ;)
Umm.. not exactly.
Android ASKS you FIRST. And if you change your mind about using their location tracking, you can simply turn it off and it actually stays off. ;)
Aniej
Jan 2, 09:13 PM
Okay, so when do people want to meet up? Do we want to do a drinks and dinner outing, or just drinks, or something even less formal?
You gona wait for me for next year when I can make it my friend?
You gona wait for me for next year when I can make it my friend?
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий